I just caught a few minutes of this recently, though Ive seen the full show in the past. The part I saw thats worth noting is the shows dramatic and convincing explanation for the 10pm (I believe) set of Phoenix Lights: they were flares. UFOlogists reject this idea out of hand, but the show has a demonstration that the "winking out" of the lights coincides with them disappearing behind a mountain range. This is accomplished by aligning the original "UFO" footage with daytime footage taken in the same spot. You can literally see the lights going behind the mountain--which means they werent over the city, but were on the other side of the range, where the military was conducting exercises (and dropping flares). I dont remember whether the show had an explanation for the earlier sightings of V-shaped craft (probably not), but the footage you always see of this incident -- on Larry King, for instance -- is definitely flares. UFOlogists dont do themselves any favors when they ignore conclusive proof like this; it makes them look like kooks. It also wastes time and resources that could be spent on investigating actual, unexplained incidents.
Friday, 13 June 2014
Ufos Over Phoenix Partial Review
Posted by PedroGonzales at 20:02 Labels: aliens, cropcircles, ufocasebookI just caught a few minutes of this recently, though Ive seen the full show in the past. The part I saw thats worth noting is the shows dramatic and convincing explanation for the 10pm (I believe) set of Phoenix Lights: they were flares. UFOlogists reject this idea out of hand, but the show has a demonstration that the "winking out" of the lights coincides with them disappearing behind a mountain range. This is accomplished by aligning the original "UFO" footage with daytime footage taken in the same spot. You can literally see the lights going behind the mountain--which means they werent over the city, but were on the other side of the range, where the military was conducting exercises (and dropping flares). I dont remember whether the show had an explanation for the earlier sightings of V-shaped craft (probably not), but the footage you always see of this incident -- on Larry King, for instance -- is definitely flares. UFOlogists dont do themselves any favors when they ignore conclusive proof like this; it makes them look like kooks. It also wastes time and resources that could be spent on investigating actual, unexplained incidents.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment