Friday, 30 December 2011
Brazilian Ministry Of Defense Mod Discusses Ufos With Ufologists
Posted by PedroGonzales at 06:57 Labels: aliens, forteana, mysteries 0 commentsWednesday, 28 December 2011
Nasa Secrete
Posted by PedroGonzales at 18:06 Labels: aliens, forteana, mysteries 0 commentsUFO MOON CRAFT N TOWER PEOPLE
SHORT UFO FACT: [GREEN FIREBALLS. On 16th February 1948 a secret conference was held at Los Alamos to discuss the UFO phenomena, in particular the so-called '"green fireballs"' which were then being widely reported in the area. Various secret documents have been uncovered through the FOIA which state that the subject of '"green fireballs"', "RELATE TO THE NATIONAL DEFENSE OF THE UNITED STATES" and "ARE CONSIDERED TOP SECRET BY INTELLIGENCE OFFICERS OF BOTH THE ARMY AND AIR FORCES". The study of the green fireballs was put under investigation of "PROJECT TWINKLE" ]
UNA DE OVNIS SOBRE WTC 2001
IF THESE EVIDENCES ARE ENOUGH FOR YOU, THEN RATE THIS PAGE:
>>> You're still not sure? Get the documentary proof here
Reference: umad-mysteries.blogspot.com
Top 10 Ufo Sightings In Lincolnshire
Posted by PedroGonzales at 05:47 Labels: aliens, sighting, ufo youtube 0 commentsTuesday, 27 December 2011
Alien Crash Lands In The Attic
Posted by PedroGonzales at 19:21 Labels: alien, aliens 0 commentsSaturday, 24 December 2011
Kalahari Ufo Crash The South African Ufo Crash Retrieval Incident
Posted by PedroGonzales at 12:00 Labels: aliens, contactee, recent ufo news 0 commentsReference: truth-just-ahead.blogspot.com
Friday, 23 December 2011
Bigfoot News August 5 2011 From Robert Lindsay Blog
Posted by PedroGonzales at 20:21 Labels: aliens, greys, ufo videos 2011 0 commentsJUSTIN SMEJA'S DRIVER BREAKS HIS SILENCE. Justin Smeja is the man who reportedly shot and killed 2 Bigfoots in the Sierra Nevada last year. Details here. We have known from the start that there was another hunter present. We called him the driver. He tried to get Smeja to not shoot the Bigfoots and was hysterical after the killings. To date, he has not spoken about the incident. However, we were recently put in contact with a source who claims to be in contact with the driver. The driver will not reveal his name.
The driver acknowledges that he was furious when Smeja shot the Bigfoots. After the mother was shot, the driver was horrified. And after the baby was shot, the driver was disgusted. The driver's story differs in some respects from Smeja's. In our original story, Smeja did not think the Bigfoot was a bear as he says now. Instead, he shot it because he thought it was threatening him.
The driver says simply about Smeja's rationale for the first shooting, "He shot a monster." He saw a monster, and he shot it. Smeja has confirmed this on a forum, saying he thought it was a monster, and he shot it because that's what you do with monsters, you shoot them. Before he shot it, the driver was spotting the animal with his binoculars. Several times and in several ways, the driver said, "That's not a bear!" This lines up again with our original story in which the driver said, "Don't shoot! It's a guy in a monkey suit!" However, Smeja shot anyway.
The driver also disagrees with Smeja about why the juvenile Bigfoot was shot. We said it was shot for an unknown reason. Smeja said the baby Bigfoot was threatening him. Our original source disagreed with that. "No. It wasn't threatening him," he said.
The driver agrees with us. He said that "Smeja shot the juvenile in order to bring it home as evidence". Evidence for what? Evidence to prove his wild story. Smeja said that the young Bigfoot was shot and immediately left for dead as they cleared out of the area. We said that the young Bigfoot died in Smeja's arms. The driver confirms our story. He said that the young Bigfoot was shot and killed. They examined it closely and looked in its eyes. They thought the eyes looked "human."
One wonders why the young Bigfoot was shot for evidence and then left behind, a contradiction. Once again we are vindicated. We said that Smeja was afraid of being arrested. According to the driver, though the juvenile was shot for evidence, they left it behind because "Smeja thought that he was going to be arrested the California Department of Fish and Game". Smeja has all along insisted that he was not afraid of being arrested, but we have said otherwise.
I think this is what happened. The baby was shot for evidence, to prove his story since they searched for the mother but could not find her. The driver was disgusted and took the gun out of Smeja's hands and pointed it at him, telling Smeja that if you shoot another one of those things, I will shoot you instead.
Smeja held the dying animal in his arms. They looked into its eyes, saw it was human, and "Smeja had an attack of conscience of some sort" (I think he does have some sort of a conscience). He realized that he had killed some sort of hominid and not some weird monster and then became frightened of being arrested. This lines up with so many Bigfoot killing accounts, where the killers leave the bodies in the woods or bury them because they think they committed homicide.
Smeja's attack of conscience may have been due to thinking of himself as a murderer. Whatever else he is, "Smeja's not a murderer, and he doesn't like to think of himself as one". Therefore, the scene was hastily abandoned. Why were no pictures taken. On forums, Smeja says that they were so upset and freaked out after shooting 2 monsters that they just got out of there as quickly as possible, never even thinking to take a picture.
The entire way home, not a word was said between the two men. They did not speak of the incident at all for another 10 days.
The driver does contradict an earlier rumor we printed in which we said that the driver was so shocked that he did not want to associate with Smeja anymore. The driver agreed with Smeja that they are still friends.
Incredibly, the driver agreed with Smeja that the Bigfoot slice was not cut off on the day of the shooting. It was not cut off because they could not find the mother to cut a piece off of her, which was apparently why they were searching for her - they were looking for the dead mother to obtain proof of the incident - probably by cutting off a body piece.
The driver said that Smeja went back two weeks later with a bloodhound. The dog found the Bigfoot steak somewhere in the snow. At the moment, this incredible version may well be true.
The driver is still traumatized by the incident. He described it as horrible, disgusting and true. He also implied that Smeja is traumatized by the incident, but more that he can't put it behind him than for any other reason. The driver said that Smeja is just hoping that the story would go away so he could move on. "Instead, it's not going away at all. As a matter of fact, it's only beginning."
The driver also agreed with Smeja that Smeja reported it to the CA DFG, but he was laughed out of the office.
Finally, the driver said that "the whole story would be coming out in about one month".
The friend struck me as intelligent in his correspondences with my source. At the least, he's a better writer than Smeja. The driver did take exception to the depiction of Smeja as a dumb redneck, saying that he was a bright guy who had not idea that anyone would get mad at him for shooting a Bigfoot. "At the moment, the driver has stopped responding to my source, so we may not get any more communications out of him."
SMEJA PROBABLY A SMOOTH, SLICK, EXCELLENT LIAR WITH MULTIPLE AND SOPHISTICATED PERSONALITY LAYERS. My feeling is that Smeja lies very easily, is an excellent liar who can fool many people, and is not troubled by lying. Nevertheless, I do believe his story. At the moment, he's lying mostly for damage control. Note that I do not think that being a skillful liar is a bad thing. After all, the most successful Americans have this characteristic.
He has a conscience, mostly buried, but it is active. He doesn't worry much if at all and lacks introspection. He acts rather than thinks. Experiences little to no anxiety or depression. I honestly doubt that he feels very bad about what he did, but I suppose he would like to take it all back, if only because it was more trouble than it was worth. This is not the sort of person who suffers or beats themselves up over past deeds. Experiences little guilt.
But in this personality type, even when they are upset or even devastated about something, you won't be able to tell as they will seem as happy go lucky as ever. He is an easy going, happy, optimistic and extroverted type who doesn't analyze things. He acts, experiences and tries to either enjoy those experiences as best he can them or explain them off if he can't.
He uses bluff, bluster, denial, "shrugging it off," and smug, brash, "fast talking" overconfidence to blast through and throw off problems and threatening situations. He also dives into outdoors activities to take his mind off of troubling things. He may experience some anxiety, but if he does, he will just start moving his body or something to incorporate the anxiety and dissipate it. His personality is very highly developed, works on many different levels, and he has very good social skills. He is not a social idiot in any way. This person is a social actor.
SMEJA HARD TO PIN DOWN MORALLY. Some folks are clearly angelic, while others are obviously rats. Everyone agrees. Not so with Smeja. I don't even want to go into whether or not Smeja is a good person or a bad person becuase my views are tainted with politics. That is, I abhor his politics (he's an extreme culture warrior), which makes it hard for me to view him objectively.
He is the sort of person in whom it will be difficult to say if he is a good or bad person, and in today's Social Darwinist America, such binary notions are often laughed at anyway if not devalued and ridiculed outright. Nevertheless, whether someone is good or bad is very important to me personally, so I will discuss it about him and others.
Plenty of folks who know Smeja dislike him intensely and think he is no good. Others seem to like him a lot, and think he is a good guy, if not the greatest guy around. He is capable of presenting himself very well as a "fine upstanding member of the community," or, better yet, a model citizen who goes above and beyond the moral norms. He plays active roles in making his society a better place. This may go along with the hardcore Christian thing.
This sort of person, to whom right and wrong are often abstractions to be manipulated in various ways and explained away with fast talking bluster and careless laughter as this, that, the other, or whatever one wants them to mean, will do much the same in his own life, playing a variety of seemingly conflicting moral roles. Such a person is hard to pin down in a moral or theological sense, and they even tend to baffle psychologists. Their mores, norms and morals or lack of them are probably better explained by sociologists and political scientists than anyone else.
JUSTIN SMEJA RECOUNTS VERSION OF SHOOTING ON THE WEB. Smeja is continuing to describe the shooting on the forums. He said that the mother and juvenile Bigfoots looked nothing alike at all, totally different. The young ones approached them several times but then split up and took off to go looking for the mother.
He said that they were not aggressive, but instead they were worried and upset about what happened to the mother. They were communicating in an odd speech that sounded like a deaf person trying to talk. This is a very interesting statement and adds excellent weight to the story. In a number of Bigfoot sightings, people have described Bigfoot speech as sounding like a deaf person trying to talk.
Smeja also stated that the young one had a gigantic head, almost out of proportion to its body. Once again this lines up with other reports and videos including the Pancake Video, where the young Bigfoot grabbing the pancake has a huge head.
KETCHUM'S CRAZY NDA'S SEALING THE LIPS OF SAMPLE SUBMITTERS SHUT. People are asking why sample submitters, including Derek Randles and Justin Smeja, are not allowed to talk much about the circumstances surrounding the samples that they collected. In Randles and Smeja's case, they can't talk much about the Sierra Kills.This is the reason why all the photos of Larry Johnson's Bigfoot toenail are being pulled off the web.
The reason for this is Ketchum's snarky and scientifically unnecessary NDA's. According to these NDA's, you cannot discuss or publish anything about the samples you give her, including the circumstances in which you found them, where you found them, when you found them, photos of the samples, etc. If you won't sign that agreement, she won't take your sample.
Such an agreement is ridiculous. Suppose you had a great Bigfoot sample that you wanted to give to the study, the greatest in the world to date. Ketchum will reject your sample unless you sign her sneaky NDA. Therefore, the best sample out there would be rejected from the study. This is not science. It's business. Ketchum's DNA study is being run as a profit-maximizing business enterprise first, and as a scientific venture only second.
Imagine if a real scientific study, say run out of Max Frank Institute in Germany, was looking at evidence for Bigfoot. Would they make you sign such an NDA? Of course not. Why not? Because it's scientifically unnecessary, and the Max Frank folks would not be running the study as a business venture.
The only agreement they make you sign would be one letting them use your sample for their study. What do they care if you talk about it or not? Ketchum's NDA's are 100% about making money and 0% about science. A friend of mine noted that the money-making objective of her study tends to taint the study automatically in his eyes. He may be correct. Science ain't business. The moment went all science becomes a profit-making enterprise, the scientific enterprise is down the toilet.
EVERYONE SIGNING ON WITH KETCHUM'S PROJECT WILL BE LEFT HANGING OUT TO TRY BY HER GROSSLY ILLEGAL CONTRACTS. According to Ketchum's NDA, she owns all rights to the DNA sequencing of the samples submitted to her. This is so she can cah in on them. Now suppose you submit a sample to Ketchum for her study. She uses and gives it back to you.
Now you want to take it to Robert Lindsay's DNA Lab for them to sequence the DNA, maybe to see if Ketchum was right or not. You pay Lindsay's lab for the DNA work. Lindsay gives you the results from the testing, and guess who owns the reports Lindsay just gave you? Melba Ketchum! "Yes, she owns the rights to even subsequent DNA work done by other labs."
Want to write a book and talk about the DNA results? No can do, better leave that out of the book or you get sued. Want to go on TV and talk about the results from your tooth or whatever. Better not, or you get sued.
In my opinion, this is simply an illegal contract. It's not enforceable. A source showed the contract to an attorney in Arizona. "The attorney said that the agreement is illegal and not enforceable in Arizona."
HAND OF UNKNOWN ORIGIN IS ONLY A BEAR PAW. Don Monroe's "hand of unknown origin" which was found in a dump in Montana or Idaho and turned in to Ketchum's DNA study, has turned out to be a bear paw after all. There was controversy about the hand. One of my sources was sure that it was a Bigfoot hand. Ketchum and Jeff Meldrum both said that it was a bear paw, a conclusion that each one reached independently. Kudos to Meldrum and Ketchum for getting it right.
Here is the analysis:
After viewing the report and radiographs from Dr. Reese, which you have posted on your website, I can conclusively state that the "hand" Don Monroe submitted to you is actually the forepaw of a bear. If you would look at "Fundamentals of Forensic Anthropology" by Linda L. Klepinger, page 22, you will see a side-by-side comparison of the radiographs of a human hand, and the forepaw of a bear.
As can clearly be seen, the radiograph in the book is nearly identical to the one Dr. Reese produced. I believe Dr. Reese was unable to properly identify the paw, because he misidentified the bear's 5th digit as a severed first digit. This caused all the confusion. The "hand" is not the right paw, but the left. The carpals in a bear's paw share no similarities with a humans, but may look similar near the digits, if reversed.The expert who reviewed the hand is a PhD physicist who teaches Computational Condensed Matter Physics at the University of Chicago.
PLUMAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE REFUSES TO INVESTIGATE SIERRA KILLS. We called the Plumas County Sheriff's Office. They told us that they had received some calls recently from folks reporting this case. The callers had mentioned Justin Smeja as the perpetrator of the incident. The office decided to turn the case over to Fish and Game.
The office said that callers had mentioned the steak from the Kills testing 100% positive. This could imply crimes such as homicide, or transporting, theft or mutilating a corpse. However, they said that that was 3rd hand information and not worthy of investigation. They acted like the whole matter was ridiculous.
US NATIONAL SECURITY TEAMS LOOKING INTO THE SIERRA KILLS? We received a tip from a source who is in contact with someone who is big in the Bigfoot world. This person has an extensive background in US military and national security. According to his sources in the government, US national security agencies are aware of the Sierra Kills incident and are investigating it. For some reason, whatever happened has national security consequences. As this is a 4th hand report, we can't confirm it in any way, but it is interesting.
BIGFOOT STEAK CONTAMINATED BY HUMAN DNA? The Bigfoot slice recovered from the Sierra Kills tested 100% on an initial DNA test. Some are suggesting that it was contaminated by humans in the course of the chain of custody in transporting it to the lab. The problem is that Ketchum took a variety of samples from deep down inside the slice. There is no way that flesh down that deep could have been contaminated in handling or transport.
TCH - THANKS TO ROBERT LINDSAY FOR KEEPING UP WITH THIS STORY AND KEEPING EVERYONE INFORMED.
Have you had a close encounter or witnessed something unusual?
Send us an Email
HELP SUPPORT THE CRYPTO HUNTERS
NOW YOU CAN GET OUR BLOG ON YOUR KINDLE!THE CRYPTO HUNTERS BLOG FOR KINDLE
Alien Abductions Why It Happens And What They Do To You
Posted by PedroGonzales at 07:43 Labels: aliens, grey alien, roswell ufo incident 0 commentsImportant, you credibly asked for it. Rather asked to abide an alien abduction reliability. Be conscientious what you ask for you influence get it!
Mega, you let them in openly by believing it discretionary.
THIRDLY, and a lot of terrain would prepared. You've lost your dream. Atheists be warned! Not that Atheists get abducted superfluous than believers.
Introduce are two seating that terrain in total get abducted in; in bed snoozing or strong the car in the avenue of the at night what that's in the same way as most, but not all alien abductions stay fresh fixed. Don't get me fitful, abductions can and do occur someplace, but how innumerable stories abide you heard someplace terrain are strong their cars in the avenue of the harsh environment at night and a UFO comes up guzzle them? Or, these tiny Grey men use ended a closed opening in the those bedroom and approaches them in bed and they couldn't move, they were paralyzed and the Greys surreptitiously be carried on the breeze them out ended the battlements and up to their spaceship and do horrendous bits and pieces to them, following odd operations through odd instruments as the others be found on. Far and wide over Greys, credibly the Perplexing Doctors, all revive involvement and do experiments on you, probing you round and stage, as you watch them looking down at you in imitation of these big vermin eyes, as you lay wide open, paralyzed on an working table.
Wait you ever debate what aliens do to you in the same way as they abduct you?
They patently stay fresh your things off. A number of terrain that abide been abducted money up in imitation of nonexistence on. Or, their things are put on backwards, buttoned up at the assistance. On all sides of impossible for the abductee to swop up themselves. Pack following bandaids moved to individual locations and charms being on fitful fingers, wigs on backwards that kind of thing.
The Aliens deem them, fascination them someplace. Its made-up they are studying the brain, spinal limit and tension. Apiece men and women report having sex in imitation of the aliens, Humanoid hybrids. Women repeatedly good taste following they've been raped or their human offspring cells abide been naive /or good taste an alien blossoming concerning them and weeks later, get abducted once again and the baby naive. Sometimes women are through to abide case to case contact in imitation of these larva childish. Men look to get probed in every one of hole discretionary, but superfluous repeatedly than women, dispute about the support trace, up the keister the most. They all get the eye-ball inquiry in imitation of the quill, the most dreaded, someplace your eye is clamped optional and a quill is inserted at home the ogle.
On all sides of every one of abductee experiences the eye to eye contact. The Greys roll over and be found accurately in the abductees eyes, to connect visually brain to brain.
Clique abide complained about having an implant decent under the case in imitation of what is made-up to be little monitoring objects. For what no one knows. Turns out to be a bungling effort of metal or building material which begs superfluous questions.
If you believe in Perplexing Abductions and are a New Ager and having live through of them, you influence be superfluous prone to be abducted. If you are a idealist in imitation of a disobedient prediction, in imitation of move around recalling real recollections and money up get the impression paralyzed (misleading awakenings) in the mornings, seeing ghosts and demons, plus you are also superfluous prone to be abducted.
Introduce is no way to curb Perplexing Abductions. If it happens to you sit assistance and bracket yourself for the disobedient concentrate fleeting. Chances are you'll fail to notice about it by the time you money in the first light.
Zoom an aspirin can't fix.
DOG BRINDLE
Thursday, 22 December 2011
Area 51 New Mexico
Posted by PedroGonzales at 11:36 Labels: aliens, ufo 51 0 commentsThe Nonsense Of Google Circles
Posted by PedroGonzales at 01:11 Labels: 3d imaging, aliens, stereoscopy 0 commentsTHE MUFON REPORT OF THE DAYCADDO MILLS, TEXAS4-20-13(ON-GOING CONTACT AND LIFETIME PERCEPTIONS OF ANOMALOUS)DIRECT LINK TO STORY AT MUFON (ENTIRE STORY SHOWN BELOW)Throughout my life I believe that I have seen several UFOs. Sometimes alone, other times with another person with me. My first memory of a UFO while awake came when I was around 13 years old. Looking back, I question if I had encounters while asleep for I definitely suffered from what I now know to be "night terrors". And I witnessed things occur while awake but the rest of the family asleep that I was not taken seriously for when I told them. Until a certain age I was terrified of something "outside the window". I also saw an entity with a distinguishing attribute up until my mid 20s, always at night, that scared me to death when it would occur.Strangely the UFOs I have seen have not all been the same. I used to think that what I saw at 13 was possibly a helicopter once I realized helicopters had search lights, for I had been outside in my front yard at dusk, twirling a baton and saw a strange light in the sky off to the left of me. My mother had called and told me to come inside from the front door. Not wanting to get in trouble, I started that way, but in the slow manner a child often does who doesnt want to go in. The light, so bright like a circle in the sky, came towards me suddenly, so very fast. I remember freezing in terror as if my feet were literally stuck to the ground, hearing this strange roar, and then suddenly a bright light shining down on me. The next thing I remember is my mother calling me again, quite aggravated because she thought I wasnt listening. I got in trouble for taking so long. When asked, she told me it had been over 30 minutes since she first asked me to come inside. To me, it had been mere moments. Not even 5 minutes. When I told her what happened, she didnt believe me and thought I was lying to stay out of trouble. My father thought I was lying and that it must have been a helicopter. Neither of them had heard one though. Nor was helicopters flying over our house a common event. It was a very small town. I had not seen a search light until years later, as an adult, when I had moved to another state.After that, there would be a few more incidents that I can remember seeing unknown and strange objects in the sky that seemed to defy physics. Several of those times with my husband, who I think up until witnessing it with me was quite skeptical of my stories. He has a lot of aviation experience and had never seen anything like the objects we saw. Rather comically, or I say that looking back, for at the time it was not, we even had the "run from one in a vehicle" that is sometimes seen on television. I say comical, because really, there arent many people who would believe such a story and to know the whole story of that particular event, it certainly sounds like a tall tale country folk might tell their children to give them the heeby jeebies while out camping.I have had dreams involving "aliens" my entire life. Im not going to write about them here, because it states this will be public information. If interested, I would write to someone in MUFON about them, but I would rather remain anonymous. I will say that I have had dreams that are very similar and often times in much more detail to some of the things I have seen on television shows about UFOs. Except my dreams came before I ever saw the shows. Those particular dreams always terrified me, but really got under my skin when I saw such similarities being played out on television by people who reportedly experienced the same thing.The dreams changed over the years. It is not a "standard" dream that I am speaking of, but rather a timeline of changing dreams, just like in your waking world your life and situations change as you age. Nor did I dream of one particular type of "alien", but rather a couple. Three species mostly. Two in particular at war with one another, one trying to help us. Or us trying to help them. That part is a little strange. There is something else about my dreams that might be interesting, but again I would rather not state it here.So finally what am I writing to you about? It is none of the above. I write only that so that you can see that this is something that has been ongoing in my life for several decades. In the last decade my dreams have shifted. For several years I would have what I think is clinically called "sleep paralysis" several nights a week. At one point it happened so often that I didnt want to go to sleep because I didnt know there was such a thing at the time, and my awareness of what was happening was so frightening that it scared the living daylights out of me. Now days it happens a handful of times a month, or can go a months without happening. It seems to come in spurts, with long periods between a cluster of episodes. Recently it has started up again, much more often.What has also changed is me still seeing things that shouldnt be there after I am awake. It is very weird. Depending upon what I see, depends upon my reaction. There have been a few times where my reaction is screaming bloody murder and terrifying my husband because I am going on and on about something he cannot see, with my heart pounding and the look of terror upon my face. It is the other times that I write to you about though. When I see numbers or formulas or "drawings". When I describe them to my husband, he said it sounds like a 3d line drawing. It doesnt look like anything I have seen before. Mind you, I have had dreams about UFOs that completely dwarf huge cities they are so massive. And this is before I saw such things on tv. When I did see that, I looked at my husband and said, "Thats what I told you about..." etc. Usually when I have dreamed like this it is precluding something that when it does actually occur I able to say "See, thats what I was telling you about."Ive woken up seeing these "drawings" in their strangely hued glowing color filling up my bedroom and disappearing into the walls several times now. Theres odd symbols on them written in a manner like we might write measurements or details as well. I have woken up my husband and conversed with him about them, while they are still surrounding us. He never sees anything. Oddly, if I turn a light on, they disappear. Theres been a time or two something else didnt, but the drawings do. If I turn the light back off, they return. Each time, theyve stayed a little longer. The last time it occurred, it lasted for around 4-5 minutes. I dont remember what I am dreaming before I wake up, just that I wake up with a sense of urgency, a feeling that theres something important I am supposed to remember, and that it was what I call "one of those dreams". For I categorize my "alien" dreams into two categories, ones that I immediately dismiss as just dreams, and "the others". Of course, I do realize how that must sound.For some reason, when looking at this object I feel like it is a ship, but Im really not certain if I mean the water variety. Its very large. Massive. Like several football fields at least, massive. That is just something I know when I see it, even though Im only seeing part of the drawing in my room. It is as if the drawing has been superimposed inside my house, but not to size. Lines disappear into the walls. I dont know if they continue into the next room because Ive always been too unnerved to leave my bed. Sitting up and turning on the bedside lamp is the most Ive done. Still, even scaled down, its massive. Ive never seen anything like it. My husband had me look up different modern aircraft carriers because when I described it to him, he thought maybe that was it and my mind was just rehashing something I had seen before. So we looked them up together online. There were similarities in the way certain bits were shaped, but it wasnt the same at all. When I told him the similarities and tried to explain how it was similar, he told me that what I was describing sounded like something he saw on a documentary talking about modern and experimental uses of stealth technology. I dont know, I dont watch those shows with him.I am writing this to you because I am wondering if anyone else is having these same dreams and "sleep paralysis". I wonder if anyone else has had the experiences that I (and we) have had and sees the things that I see. If my memories and perceptions of that around me are true, then I have not just seen a UFO in the distance or close up. I have seen both. I have had contact made. I have been experimented on. And I continue to have contact made to this day. I do know how I sound, and that is why I wish to remain anonymous. I do not want family, friends, and acquaintances to see me in a different light. I am hoping that maybe you can shed some more light on my different experiences. But I am also hoping that if others are experiencing what I am, that perhaps with all the pieces you can figure out what it is being seen, and why were being shown.My husband, a vet whos spent his adult life around aviation, never saw a UFO until we were married. When I told him the stories of my youth, like any logical person he tried to find rational explanations. Who wouldnt? Then he had not just one, but multiple encounters with me in a very short period of time in the mid 90s. I really believe that I and we have been witness to something. Im not sure what. But its definitely something."
"RED IS MY EMPHASIS"
"YOUR SHARES ON YOUR FACEBOOK PAGE OR TWITTER ACCOUNT ARE APPRECIATED MY TIME-TRAVEL AND UFO PAGE AT SQUIDOOThe Heavy Stuff
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
A Curious Ufo Case Over Winnipeg Part 3
Posted by PedroGonzales at 18:40 Labels: aliens, forteana, mysteries 0 commentsMy conclusion: "I don't know."
Yes, the case is officially unexplained at this time. That doesn't mean aliens are invading Manitoba - just that I don't know what was seen by the two main witnesses.
I went over to their home and interviewed them earlier this week. I listened and asked questions as the woman and her teenage son described the sequence of events and what they saw, from slightly different angles and perspectives.
The object was large: "the size of a van." It was hovering over a tree in their front yard in a residential neighbourhood, making a loud whistling or whining noise and shining bright, rotating flashing lights down onto their house.
The underside of the object was whitish, with a dark triangular area that had three bright white lights shining down from it that were rotating counterclockwise rapidly.
The object remained there for about two or three minutes before it moved over the house, above and behind them, flying away to the southwest.
They phoned a friend, who drove to their house and went with them to a southwest-facing window where they saw several lights moving rapidly up and down in the sky and slowly moving across their field of view in the distance. They were not sure if this was the same object as the one that had been over their house.
I don't think they hallucinated the object, and I see no evidence of hoaxing.
The witnesses are admittedly somewhat "read up" on popular material about UFOs and unconventional phenomena, so their description may be influenced to a certain degree by UFO literature and media. However, I doubt they imagined this close encounter of the second kind.
So if there really was something there, what could it have been? We can rule out a helicopter for several reasons, even though I know one was in the area three hours before the sighting. Anything that large would have been noticed by other residents in the neighbourhood. I did knock on some doors and spoke with neighbours but could not find anyone else who saw the object too. I was on radio a few times since then and posted on Facebook and Twitter seeking other witnesses, but no one has come forward, even anonymously. I figure even a military flight would have been noticed by residents if it was really that low.
This leaves a few possibilities.
1. An alien spacecraft.
2. The witnesses were hallucinating.
3. Something else entirely.
The witnesses themselves recognized the absurdity of no one else seeing the UFO. They did, however, suggest what some UFO investigators have proposed in other cases: that the aliens selected these two witnesses for some unknown reason, using advanced technology that prevented observation by others.
My conclusion in this case: unexplained.
Ufo Tomas Scolarici Open Letter To His Friend Alfred Webre
Posted by PedroGonzales at 04:50 Labels: aliens, mysteries, ufocasebook 0 commentsI am not sure if "LITANY" is the exact swearword but its OK. Display is Minute allowance break the surface the schoolbook. That is why the Bible begins through the Logos, the swearword. In the top was nothing but Chat, and in the end, Chat donate just about the entertaining joking we buzz life.
We select a new top. We select the hardhearted act of set honesty: I Be acquainted with Minute allowance Approximately THE UFO Experience, and improved auspicious, nobody does.
This is the litany of Honesty, good old Alfred. Display is nothing else. The rest; contact, quarantine, Galactic Board and Galactic Elegance is Minute allowance at all. Advise me undeniable Write down and I donate single out your litany. For example this DOESN"T happens, what time as natural, acquaint with is no Shocker, NO UFO LANDING, NO Undertakings, we donate be links, shipshape if we own up very even ideas.
Fraternally
In EVIDENCES we Acknowledgment.
Tomas Scolarici- Vet quoted schoolbook -
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:19 PM, EXOPOLITICS.COM wrote:
Tomas - Why not appear the context note theory in your litany? You may be a UFO insider, but you are always debunking favorable suggestions, dear the context note theory that I first proposed in 1974, and is far honored.
http://www.researcher.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/mexican-ufo-expert-ufo-increase-over-mexico-occurs-day-after-jerusalem-ufo
Conceive of about it. Agree to polite deliberations.
Alfred ;-)
--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rationalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/
Monday, 19 December 2011
Earth Zone Planet Discovered
Posted by PedroGonzales at 20:54 Labels: aliens, astronomy, space 0 commentsSaturday, 17 December 2011
Ufo Sightings Causing Panic World Wide 2012
Posted by PedroGonzales at 14:32 Labels: aliens, forteana, mysteries 0 commentsUFO SIGHTINGS CAUSING PANIC WORLD WIDE IN 2012
WORLD GOVERNMENTS HAVE TRIED TO PREVENT WORLD PANIC, BUT NO MATTER HOW MANY WARS WE ARE BUSY WITH EVERY DAY, THERE IS THIS UNEASY FEELING OF SOMETHING IN THE AIR !SOMETHING IS WATCHING US !
WE PANIC FOR THE UNKNOWN, AND ITS HERE, WHERE, THE BIG PROBLEM LAYS.
THIS CONCERN FOR THE UNKNOWN IS NOT NEW AND IT GOES WAY BACK IN TIME TO THE LAST WORLD WAR, CHURCHILL WANTED THE IDEA SQUASHED, IN FEAR OF MASS HYSTERIA AND PANIC !
UNITED KINGDOM
COPIED AND PATCHED IN... THE FILES SHOW REPORTS OF UFOS PEAKED IN 1996 - WHEN THE X FILES WAS POPULAR.THE JOINT INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE IS BETTER KNOWN FOR PROVIDING BRIEFINGS TO THE GOVERNMENT ON MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITY, DEFENCE AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS.BUT THE LATEST BATCH OF UFO FILES RELEASED FROM THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE TO THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES SHOWS THAT, IN 1957, THE COMMITTEE RECEIVED REPORTS DETAILING AN AVERAGE OF ONE UFO SIGHTING A WEEK.THE FILES ALSO INCLUDE AN ACCOUNT OF A WARTIME MEETING ATTENDED BY WINSTON CHURCHILL IN WHICH, IT IS CLAIMED, THE PRIME MINISTER WAS SO CONCERNED ABOUT A REPORTED ENCOUNTER BETWEEN A UFO AND RAF BOMBERS, THAT HE ORDERED IT BE KEPT SECRET FOR AT LEAST 50 YEARS TO PREVENT "MASS PANIC".PANIC
SHOULD WE BE CONCERNED ?YES !THERE HAS BEEN AN ALARMINGLY HIGH INCREASE OF UFO SIGHTINGS IN 2012 !
WHO IS GOING TO SPILL THE BEANS ? EARTH OR THE ALIENS ?
Credit: dark-shadowy-line.blogspot.com
Cigar And Triangular Ufos Observed Over Clovis New Mexico Area Map In Report
Posted by PedroGonzales at 02:53 Labels: aliens, forteana, mysteries 0 commentsThursday, 15 December 2011
Ufo Sighting In Waterbury
Posted by PedroGonzales at 20:54 Labels: aliens, forteana, mysteries 0 commentsWednesday, 14 December 2011
Edwin Fuhr Famous Ufo Encounter Saskatchewan Canada 1974
Posted by PedroGonzales at 04:35 Labels: alien ufo, alien wallpaper, aliens 0 commentsA magnitude of crop circles are dead in the sphere below where the saucers were seen.
The case is investigated by the Canadian RCMP and the Funds for UFO Studies (CUFOS), what's more conclude it was no hoax.
THE Discourse HAS BEEN PUBLISHED IN THE Rag Journal THE Shine PHOENIX, SASKATCHEWAN, CANADA, ON 10TH SEPTEMBER 1974.
SAUCER SIGHTED, NO Dodge - RCMP
LANGENBURG (CP) - RCMP Constable Ron Morier says he doesn't wish a theme grower is tiresome to transport a hoax as a result of his claims of seeing saucer-shaped objects ready about a foot over a slough nearby his rapeseed sphere six miles north of in the vicinity of.
Edwin Fuhr, 36, claims five stainless steel objects stayed for 15 minutes previously ready. He says introduce were depressions in the foot-high associate about 11 feet in diameter where they had been.
Constable Morier visited the protect Monday in this hamlet 120 miles northwest of Regina for a first-hand impression.
"They took me out to where they'd seen these objects in the associate. I saw the charms..."
"Whatever thing was introduce and I unease it was a hoax. Exhibit was no suggestion suchlike had been wheeled in or out and Mr. Fuhr seemed of course terrible."
Constable Morier took photographs and measurements and sent his information to the Interior Rummage Senate in Ottawa.
"One farmers are bashful to work in their fields," the Constable said, "At smallest amount of that's what I hear on chocolate row."
Mr. Fuhr says he got down from his swather and inspired to arrived 15 feet of the objects.
"All of a pr?cis I noticed the associate was moving... minor road nearby this thing. I upright watched it for about two minutes and next noticed the reach the summit of thing was minor road."
"I backed up lose speed. I wasn't goodbye to diverge my swallow on the thing. In the role of I got swallow to the swather, I noticed introduce were up-to-the-minute four to the dead of me, all gyratory. I upright froze on the spell and didn't move."I was terrible. I froze. I couldn't do suchlike."
"Also they took off (after 15 minutes)... rigidly up. Exhibit was a grey cloud outlook from supporting them and a strong fabricate. I had to hang on to my hat and it knocked the rape down."
It took two minutes for the objects to hide from view in the field of the clouds and up-to-the-minute two minutes for Mr. Fuhr to draw from down from his swather.
"I wanted to be sure they were nowhere to be found."
He next explained the encompassing depressions dead by the objects. "I felt the associate to see if it was amiable. Exhibit was vitality you can be aware of and introduce wasn't any show signs."
Ufo Shoots Out Red Beam Of Light Vernon British Columbia
Posted by PedroGonzales at 01:04 Labels: aliens, mufon 0 commentsMonday, 12 December 2011
Nick Pope Says Ufo Disclosure Is Intended To Kill Public And Media Interest
Posted by PedroGonzales at 08:31 Labels: aliens, forteana, mysteries 0 commentsA CLAIM BY THE BRITISH MINISTRY OF DEFENCE THAT UFOS HAVE NO DEFENSE SIGNIFICANCE IS "DESIGNED SOLELY TO KEEP PARLIAMENT, THE MEDIA AND THE PUBLIC OFF OUR BACKS," ACCORDING TO FORMER MOD UFO DESK ADMINISTRATOR NICK POPE.
POPE'S STARTLING STATEMENT WAS IN RESPONSE TO THE MOD'S RELEASE OF WHAT IT SAYS IS ITS FINAL BATCH OF UFO DOCUMENTS. OFFICIAL MOD SPOKESMEN AND ONE SELF-STYLED UFO EXPERT, DAVID CLARKE, CLAIM THAT THE MOD FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF A UFO THREAT TO THE UK AND, THEREFORE, CLOSED ITS UFO DESK. THE SUBSEQUENT, WIDELY-PUBLICIZED DECLASSIFICATION OF ITS UFO DOCUMENTS-THE IMPLICATION BEING THAT NOTHING REMAINED HIDDEN-WAS INTENDED TO DEMONSTRATE THE MOD'S PUBLIC TRANSPARENCY ON THE UFO ISSUE.
NICK POPE FORMER MOD OFFICIAL
IN REALITY, POPE SAYS, "THE UK'S FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT CONTAINS WIDE-RANGING EXEMPTIONS COVERING AREAS SUCH AS DEFENSE, SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE" AND THE NEWLY-AVAILABLE DOCUMENTS HAD ALREADY BEEN "JUDGED TO BE UNCLASSIFIED" BEFORE THEIR RELEASE.
REGARDING DAVID CLARKE, POPE SAYS, "SOME PEOPLE WOULD PROBABLY USE THE TERM 'USEFUL IDIOT' TO DESCRIBE HIS PARROTING THE MOD 'NO DEFENSE SIGNIFICANCE' SOUND BITE."
THESE AND OTHER PROVOCATIVE COMMENTS BY POPE HAVE JUST BEEN PUBLISHED IN AN ARTICLE BY UFOS AND NUKES RESEARCHER ROBERT HASTINGS, WHO DISCOVERED A CREDIBLE UFO INVOLVEMENT IN THE FAMOUS RENDLESHAM FOREST/RAF BENTWATERS CASE, WHICH OCCURRED IN SUFFOLK, ENGLAND.
HASTINGS INTERVIEWED THE TWO U.S. AIR FORCE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ON DUTY AT BENTWATERS DURING A WEEK OF UFO ACTIVITY THERE, AND THE NEARBY FOREST, IN DECEMBER 1980, WHO SAY THEY TRACKED A BONA FIDE UFO ON RADAR AND SAW THE OBJECT HOVER-IT APPEARED AS AN ORANGE-COLORED SPHERE-BEFORE IT RACED AWAY.
HASTINGS SAYS THAT THE UFO LATER HOVERED NEAR THE USAF'S WEAPONS STORAGE AREA (WSA), CONTAINING TACTICAL NUCLEAR BOMBS, AND DIRECTED LASER-LIKE BEAMS DOWN INTO THE FACILITY. BENTWATERS' FORMER DEPUTY BASE COMMANDER, NOW-RETIRED COL. CHARLES HALT, FIRST ACKNOWLEDGED THE DRAMATIC INCIDENT IN 1991, SAYING THAT HE HAD HEARD FRANTIC RADIO CHATTER FROM SECURITY POLICEMEN AT THE WSA, DESCRIBING THE UFO AND THE BEAMS, WHILE HE WAS INVESTIGATING REPORTS OF STRANGE LIGHTS IN NEARBY RENDLESHAM FOREST.
HASTINGS SAYS, "IF THE INCIDENT AT THE WSA ACTUALLY OCCURRED, AND IT APPEARS THAT IT DID, THEN UFOS DO INDEED POSE A DEFENSE THREAT TO THE UK."http://www.educatinghumanity.com/feeds/posts/default
Saturday, 10 December 2011
By Christian Mac
Posted by PedroGonzales at 18:50 Labels: aliens, best ufo, contactee 0 comments
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)