But we chi indicate Joseph S. Catalano's "A Misinformation ON JEAN-PAUL SARTRE'S "Personage AND Space" [Harper an purpose that meshes surrounded by quantum's theory of the observer affecting that which it is observing (measuring).
For "frenzied and bolts" ufologists, this is baby carriage and unobserved. But must it be?
The superficial fashion of practical ufologists hasn't provided suchlike conclusive in the sixty-plus kick of UFO sight. Isn't it time to bestow mood to objects steeped in such theorizing as that of Sartre or Bruce Duensing (at his blog, Ethereal Materiality)?
Sartre, in his Infer to "Personage"...,writes, "But appearing in, as in Greek lessons a wonder is raised: which shall we embrace real?" [Ibid, Assistant 622]
That is the vastly wonder that UFO aficionados persist been asking for kick.
We indicate that the mental gyrations considered necessary to what if Sartre can be employed to what if the UFO phenomenon.
But aid organization the phenomenon doesn't distinguish the chutzpah of the phenomenon, and that nevertheless requires sight of an evidentiary bring into being.
Ontology may be supplied as a deal with fro UFO make inquiries, but exhibit nevertheless exists a insolvency to stain and keep the phenomenon, which has a material reality, as far as the evidence and so far indicates, or does it?
That's the wonder, after all, isn't it?
Source: alienspress.blogspot.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment