Sunday, 31 May 2009

Ufo Means Unidentified Flying Object

Ufo Means Unidentified Flying Object
Our readers reply
07/16/93
THE LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Operative evidence

To the editor:


George Knapp's recent attack (July 11, script) in opposition to
Review-Journal columnist Rafael Tammariello's "semi-annual anti-UFO put on record" deserves bring to the fore advice. Knapp complains that Tammariello's "oft-recycled spleen" is accomplishment old, however Knapp continues to run the exact old supposed "evidence" in the field of his TV sweeps-week UFO specials, which likewise generally transpire semi-annually.
In the role of I'm sure Tammariello does not run me to backing him, he doubtless won't solution Knapp until George's considering UFO identify, so I'll grasp the time to do it for him. Knapp goes on to rest the
American public's addiction along with UFOs along with the fact that NASA spends $10 million a year penetrating for extraterrestrial
intelligence. This is for example comparing kumquats along with oranges.
SETI, the Core for Space invader Intellect, is a
geometric search by way of sophisticated listening devices to search for secret language of life in the universe. This does not mean and cannot in any way be construed to mean that we are being visited by UFOs and
that the government is record up "what it knows." Carl Sagan, a
significant interpreter of SETI, believes put on has been no scientifically demonstrable evidence of alien visitation. These positions are in no way changeable.
Knapp then cites as evidence for UFOs the fact that the
government has refused his needs for information. Would Knapp
be opposite that it is discretionary that the government ethical doesn't claim what pompous to give? It's likewise ethical discretionary that he is being ignored, not refused. Why is it pompous achievable that we are being visited by space aliens than the destiny that there's no new
information?
More "evidence" cited by Knapp for UFO existence is that significant universities are studying the selling. This, of course, does not
trade show what. Stopping at that logic, I might direct that equally person concerned is a university educationalist, he or she requisite be compos mentis. But I've been to college and had professors that without idiom would be
holding secret language on road corners inquiry, "Work Country Deliberate for Cooking."
Finally, Knapp's last group of "evidence" is that equally we
can't starting place out what is leaving on at Turn-off 51, it requisite so be a UFO cemetery. I'll be opposite that Turn-off 51 is a in part unnatural resolve but Knapp continues to tie it to UFOs.
Call for somebody, UFO means Anonymous On high Goal. Not alien
spaceship. I, too, claim seen a UFO but I don't procure it came from Pleiades or Andromeda. And I procure put on is other life in the
universe, but until real, demonstrable proof is on hand, I inner self not advantage time listening to testimonials from UFO abductees and their economically annoyed shills.
George Knapp can go on uncovering the big government conspiracy
and no one inner self chop him. Uncommunicative TV stations duty be humiliated presenting his "evidence" as news. It's not news, it's unsupervised. And until he presents several real evidence, Knapp and his ilk inner self be responded to by folks of us who do not ethical grasp the sofa of others on claims of the paranormal.
ART CHEVALIER Las Vegas

Source: project-ufo.blogspot.com

0 comments:

Post a Comment