Friday 14 January 2011

Again Why Cave Art And Did Other Worldly Agents Bring It About

Again Why Cave Art And Did Other Worldly Agents Bring It About
COPYRIGHT 2012, INTERAMERICA, INC.

SECRETS OF THE ICE AGE: THE World OF THE Basin ARTISTS by Evan Hadingham [Backpacker and Part, NY, 1979], pictured better, makes clear that no one knows, for sure, why outdated mankind highlighted on warren stockade or bent stone art.

And a variety of warren art is not representational such as this notional description from "Abri Leuillet" in the Paris Clearing, dating from the Neolithic period:

"Piece 285"

Mr. Hardingham presents the mystery of why art seems to convene waned after the Ice Age:

"Piece 267"

The idea that warren art was totemic in spirit, or bent for astonishing rituals is disgraceful, writes Mr. Hadingham.

Of course, hand over are a variety of totemic drawings, impartial as hand over depictions of a sexual spirit or hunting scenes.

And the idea that such art stemmed from a sport, art-for-arts sake has been bargain basement priced too.

Why do I take in presenting the warren art scenarios here?

I persist that whatever thing happened that stirred the outdated or home-grown conform, as was the case on Easter Island; that is, either paranormal, extraterrestrial, or mysterious (an intercession by spirit) agents instigated or sparked such art, doubtless by impartial being submit.

And UFOs or other-worldly beings played a domineering input in this esthetic series by infantile mankind, which passed on for a in view of the fact that to show up at the begin of the Sumerian/Egyptian cultural immaturity.

But if "exterior" agents brought on the ingenuity, why didn't it dart in an clear form?

Besides, hand over is no and has been no clear esthetic thrusts or evidence of such intellectual endeavors by folks beings encountered in UFO actions of the objector era.

Beings imagined or real, encountered by humans, convene been extraordinary in their unesthetic contact.

Was the intellectual enthusiasm lit ache ago and deceased to geminate on its own?

Did the gods or ET immerse humanity counting an intellectual DNA quality and also let it idle on its own, and if so, why?

Or is an exterior traitor sought-after at all?

In the function of caused infantile man (and objector man) to draw (or paint)?

Do we purloin an exterior person responsible as an explanation?

Tidy the Drab Astronaut theorists are averse to wax unconditionally about aliens inculcating art among their processes for humanity's "evolution," multifaceted the whispered outdated official and/or architectural input.

But there's on near....whatever thing not sooner correct, about infantile mankind's elegant line to description pictograms in the role of writing and sermon were unpleasantly mature,

And is hand over a UFO tie-in?

RR


0 comments:

Post a Comment